Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in geriatric breast cancer patients: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) can be an effective treatment option for patients with HER2 + or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, its use in geriatric patients is largely understudied. Our aim is to investigate the effect of NAST in both septuagenarians and octogenarians with HER2 + or TNBC to better understand its role in the geriatric patient population. METHODS: We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze female patients with HER2 + or TNBC between 70 and 89 years. We compared the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of septuagenarians and octogenarians using mixed-effect modeling for continuous variables and conditional logistic regressions for categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) between several subgroups was compared based on a propensity score model. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate OS between the subgroups, and log-rank test was used to compare OS results. RESULTS: A total of 16,443 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which 92.9% had infiltrative ductal carcinoma and 73.5% were TNBC. Most patients received NAST as a first course of therapy (58.8%). Septuagenarians were more likely to receive NAST (65.9%), whereas octogenarians were more likely to receive upfront surgical resection (67.7%). Our analysis demonstrated OS benefit with NAST among patients who received surgical resection. However, in patients who received NAST, decline during therapy was associated with a significantly poorer OS outcomes in general. CONCLUSION: When combined with surgical resection, NAST is an effective treatment option in both septuagenarians and octogenarians. Nonetheless, careful selection of NAST recipients in this population remains critical to optimize patient outcome.

Pathologic tumor response of invasive lobular carcinoma to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is used for locally advanced breast cancer patients with significant variation in tumor response. Our objective is to determine the clinicopathologic effect of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on invasive lobular carcinoma. A review of a single-institution data base of women diagnosed with breast cancer identified 30 patients from 1999 to 2009 with operable invasive lobular carcinoma who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient demographics and clinicopathologic data were reviewed. Cases were reviewed by a single pathologist (NNE). Residual cancer burden class was determined for each case. Median patient age was 50 years (range 25-79). All tumors were hormone receptor positive and clinical stage II or III carcinomas. Most patients (53.3%) had combination anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Therapy-related changes were noted within the tumor bed in 25 (83.3%) patients. Six (30%) of 20 patients with residual axillary disease had therapy-related nodal changes. There were 11 patients with moderate residual disease (class II) and 18 (60%) with extensive (class III); there were no complete pathologic responses (class 0). Only one patient (3.3%) converted from mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery. Four (13.3%) patients developed distant metastases; all had pleomorphic-type, clinical stage III tumors with residual cancer burden III classification and developed distant disease in the 2 years after surgery (range 0-26 months). Median follow-up time was 29.5 months (range 7-132). Patients with locally advanced pleomorphic-type lobular carcinoma appear to develop early post-treatment metastatic disease. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy did not appear to have significant impact on the surgical treatment of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.